A new report from Transport and Environment (T&E) has revealed that eliminating the use of highly polluting heavy fuel oil (HFO) by cruise ships in the Arctic region would only cost passengers the price of a glass of wine a day.

The report is based on an analysis of the impact of cruise ship MS Rotterdam if it operated on marine gas oil (MGO) during three mid-year trips to the Arctic this year.

It also found that prohibiting the use of HFO in the Arctic last year would have increased the prices of tickets on MS Rotterdam by an average of 6%.

The increase in price is estimated on this year’s fuel prices and on the assumption that the additional fuel costs were passed on to passengers.

It is equivalent to an additional €7 per day, or no more than the price of a glass of wine on-board MS Rotterdam, owned by Holland America Line.

The report also found that banning the use of HFO in the Arctic can be implemented immediately with negligible impact on the cruise industry. Cruise passengers should also accept the minimal increase in price.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.
“It’s more than worth it to reduce the risks to the unique environment that passengers are paying to see.”

T&E shipping officer Lucy Gilliam said: “Arctic cruise tourism is booming, increasing the risks of oil spills and creating more pollution. The costs per passenger of a switch to cleaner fuel are tiny.

“It’s more than worth it to reduce the risks to the unique environment that passengers are paying to see.

“Cruise companies claim that an HFO ban would be a death sentence to their industry, yet the figures show that the costs passed on to passengers are trivial. Cruises to the Arctic are, by any measure, a luxury, yet tickets are VAT exempt.”

In April last year, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) agreed to further support the move to ban the use of HFO in the Arctic region on the basis of an impact assessment.

IMO is currently inviting ideas on how to evaluate the impact of the HFO ban on communities and operators in the Arctic.